Saturday, December 4

I love the smell of open Bigotry in the Morning.

The monday before last, a partially naked white woman jumped into the arms of a football uniform wearing black man. There was much weeping and wailing and knashing of teeth. Some may have pulled out their hair in the fashion of grieving greeks. The cacophony of outrage rang far and wide. As usual and in public it was "what about the children", this being yet another example of moral decay, behind closed doors folks wispered that it must be part of the anti-miscegenationist "agenda" and feared hordes of black men defiling the purity of (southern) white femininity. In other back rooms talks of the resurrection of the Mandingo Project caused a near panic.

Most astute observers knew that the outrage was based on rascism. And while the usual suspects in the punditocracy, steered clear of the overt racial undertones, but someone forgot to keep the closet door shut. What follows is yet another example of how empowered the Bigot wing of the republican party feels. This is the most openly racist opinion piece I think I have ever had the good fortune to come across.
Samuel Francis,, Nov. 26

ABC Sports last week took careful aim at the “moral issues” that are said to have driven this month’s national election and delivered a good swift kick to their dentures on national television.

The main reaction from viewers and the professional “family values” lobby has been to denounce the nudity and clearly implied sex of the now-notorious ad that promoted last week’s Monday Night Football game. That’s all well and good, but there was more going on in the ad that no one will mention—race.

The ad shows blonde white sexpot Nicolette Sheridan of the steamy “Desperate Housewives” series smooching up to black football star Terrell Owens in the locker room of the Philadelphia Eagles. Then the young lady drops her bath towel and jumps into Mr. Owens’ not-exactly recalcitrant arms.

“Aw, hell,” he leers, “the team’s going to have to win without me.”

In the aftermath of the similar reaction to CBS’s showing of the Janet Jackson-Justin Timberlake flap during the Super Bowl last February, there can be little doubt the ABC ad was not just a blunder.

It was an intentional act of moral subversion.
Thems pretty strong words, I guess that in your view most of what passes for entertainment programming on TV are just an unintentional acts of moral subversion. I have the sneaking suspicion that when our new theocratic overlords claim the mantle of power that acts of moral subversion will be punishable by firing squad.

It was filmed the Friday before, and in the aftermath of all the jabber about moral issuesin the election, it ought to be transparent that it was intended as an act of political-cultural subversion as well.

In the CBS incident, Miss Jackson exposed her breast on camera during a performance with Mr. Timberlake. The Federal Communications Commission fined CBS, which broadcast the Super Bowl, the piddling sum of $550,000—little more than lunch money, of course, for the big networks and hardly a deterrent to similar smacks at good taste in the future.

But taste and morality are by no means the ad’s only targets.

Of course they aren't, I would imagine that the precious virtue of the female fruit of the loins of southern gentlemen is next on the agenda. A wedge driven between the demurely closed knees, leading to the inevitable corruption of the flower of the south. what follows is the sound of several jackboots falling.
Like the Jackson-Timberlake performance, the Owens-Sheridan ad was interracial and brazenly so—if only morals and taste had been the targets, the producers could easily have found white actresses who are less obviously Nordic than the golden-locked Miss Sheridan, but Nordic is what the ad’s producers no doubt wanted.
And who said that champions of aryan racial purity were anachronistic, or the sole purview of Nazi Germany. I have to admit that I am a bit stunned to find that the above paragraph was not only written, but published. Remember kids, these are the folks that just a couple weeks ago were attacking liberals as racist, because some of us thought that condi might not be up to the Job of SoS, Anne Coulter could not shut up about it. I was unaware before now that there were varying degrees of white.

I guess a brown haired girl or better yet a mexican or a jew, would have been less offensive to Mr Francis' sensibilities. A lot of people have wondered why Jed was not tapped as the standard bearer for the republican party. He is clearly the intellectual superior of his brother, I think Francis gets us to the heart of the matter. There is a reason that George P Bush is called the "little brown bush", his mother is of mexican ancestry, mestizo. If she had only been a daughter of Cortez, Jeb might be president, but unfortunately hers is a lineage of Montezuma and Cortez. Put another way, had Jeb's wife landed in Owen's arms, this column would not have seen the light of day.

For that matter, if you only wanted to take a swipe at morals and taste, you could find a black woman to rip her towel off or replace Mr. Owens with a famous white athlete (there are still a few).

But that wasn’t the point, was it? The point was not just to hurl a pie in the face of morals and good taste but also of white racial and cultural identity. The message of the ad was that white women are eager to have sex with black men, that they should be eager, and that black men should take them up on it.

For anyone who still is foolish enough to question why black folk do not in general support the party of Lincoln, presented for consideration is exhibit A. Did he really need to travel all the way down this path? I am sure that many in agreement might say "but you had me at "nordic".

So far only one voice has mentioned the ad’s racial meaning and denounced its insensitivity (to blacks)—that of black Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy.

Blacks are permitted to notice race. Whites aren’t. [Really? What the fuck do you think you are doing Mr. Jolson? -ed]

But the ad’s message also was that interracial sex is normal and legitimate, a fairly radical concept for both the dominant media as well as its audience.

Nevertheless, for decades, interracial couples of different sexes have been sneaked into advertising, movies and television series, and almost certainly not because of popular demand from either race. The Owens-Sheridan match is only the most notorious to date.

In the minds of those who produced the ad, race is at least as important as the moral and aesthetic norms their ad subverts.

Lord have mercy, how much rope does this guy need, did someone order a sufficient amount of sheets, and white hoods. I hope the cross construction team is hard at work.

To them, the race as well as the religion, the morality, and the culture of the host society are all equally hostile and oppressive forces that need to be discredited, debunked and destroyed.

If the destruction can’t happen at the polls or through the courts, they can always use the long march through the culture that control of the mass media allows.

Breaking down the sexual barriers between the races is a major weapon of cultural destruction because it means the dissolution of the cultural boundaries that define breeding and the family and, ultimately, the transmission and survival of the culture itself.

“We apologize,” smirked the spokesman for those who sponsored the ad, Mark Mandel, the Vice President of ABC Sports.

Host society????!!!?? Wow. If you had not received the message by now, you ain't gonna ever get it. Warning Will Robinson, Weapons of Mass cultural Destruction spotted ahead. (Apparently a brother has a little more power than previously advertised, No wonder the stink of fear is strong. This must be the first test of their Weapons of Bigotry Related Pogrom Activitites, program.

Owens "leers" (and dammit we used to be able to lynch them for that) Mandel "smirks" (very bad form, only his Chimperious Majesty is allowed that facial expression). One might think one has journeyed through time, but no we have not, this is not a 1968 debate regarding the constitutionality of anti-miscegenation statutes, this is November 28, 2004. More troubling are the comments from his cheerleading section in the comments below the "piece". Thanks to Atrios for the tip. Now I have to shower. Before that, just a taste of the commentary.
My brother, in the film business, tells me at least 40 people were invovled in making and showing the ad, from actors, to lighting, make-up, sounds, set, script, etc. They PLANNED this well in advance and did so on purpose.

The purpose of the ad was to promote white women having sex with black men. That was the purpose. It was no accident.

Posted by HomoRacial /aka/RICK at 6:06 PM on November 30
So this is Janet Jackson's response. "Hey! Everybody look! White men want me!" Racial equality, gender equality, economic opportunity, how can she lose? Her case is more certain than that of Koby Bryant, the "black" pro-athlete accused of raping a white teenage girl. Jackson raped the whole country! Liberals will hail her as a heroine, an unprecedented achiever of social architecture. She will quell the tide of "black" hatred for whites, by demonstrating that whites want blacks sexually. Case neutralized. (Sexual morality not an issue.) A spectacular achievement.

Indeed, it wasn't just Janet Jackson who accomplished this, but very powerful forces behind her. For this, we should all fear. Janet was just the willing slave.

It's just plain evil on the part of the liberal media to force interracial relationships or black people on an unwilling public.

Posted by b at 9:20 PM on November 30
I know one thing, if Nicolette Sheridan ever files a rape charge against a black football-player or any other non-white sports star, I would have a hard time convicting anyone after seeing her behavior on national TV.

Posted by Tim2 at 12:29 AM on December 1